Missouri Tigers football
United StatesRankings Across Categories
raw value · rank · percentile · gradePerformance
Q rating
7.2
56th LgB-
ELO Performance
1537
167th LgC
Attention
Star power
587.8K
62nd LgC+
Attention Share
0.30%
118th LgB-
Social momentum
48.0%
319th LgD+
Ranked within 291 in NCAA Football · 4.7K across all sports
Team Performance
standings, percentile-graded within the leagueRecord & form
Win%
61.5%C
Wins
8C
Losses
5
Efficiency
Point Diff
11.3B
Off
3.7C+
Def
7.6B
#738in economics, globalof 2,461#52in NCAA Football economicsof 255
Roster Stats Breakdown
51 tracked · active roster by Q scoreNo tracked roster yet.
Attention KPIs
reach, audience, search and heat — last 12 monthsReach & audience
Social media views
580.0M
all platforms · year
#41
600.0K
Social followers
all platforms
#24
220.0K
Avid fans
540.0K casual
#23
1.6M
Avg TV / game
audience
#40
36.1K
Avg attendance
per game
Search & share
Wiki searches (year)
143.0K
Wikipedia
Attention share · league
0.2%
of league attention
Momentum & heat
Momentum
48%
percentile
Year over year
+1.0%
vs last year
Week heat rank
—
spike vs expected
Month heat rank
—
spike vs expected
Year heat rank
—
spike vs expected
Business KPIs
revenue, value, audience, and fan baseBroadcast $11.6M
Commercial $7.7M
Matchday $6.5M
Revenue & value
#52
$25.8M
Revenue
annual
#75
$4.6M
Operating profit
annual
—
Franchise value
estimated
Costs & attention capital
#37
$26.5M
Payroll
annual
rank = within NCAA Football (255 clubs)
Attention per $M revenue
5.5K
Missouri Tigers football draws 5.5K views for every million dollars of revenue — outsized attention on a modest budget is the number a sponsor cares about, and nobody else publishes it.